Saturday, July 16, 2005

The Absence of Outrage

Let's see. We have a government in Ottawa that paid big money to ad agencies to do not much more than launder some of it back into Liberal Party coffers. They have billions of dollars unaccounted for in various government programs. They made a budget deal with the NDP, compromising their own platform, in order to stay in power a few more months. They attempted to bribe several opposition MP's to vote for their confidence. And don't even get me started on Belinda Stronach. Surely the Canadian people are mad as hell and aren't going to take it anymore. Aren't we? Well, according to polls, apparently we're not. After having plummeted in public opinion polls when the worst details of Adscam came out in the Gomery Inquiry, the Liberal Party is back on top.


Why are we not more outraged and calling for scalps over this? I have a couple of theories. One has to do with our beloved media. Just like in the U.S., the Canadian media is largely corporate and is more concerned with the bottom line than serving the public with quality journalism. As a result, it is lazy, parroting what has been reported in other outlets and re-transmitting the party lines unfiltered rather than doing its own investigating because it's cheaper to operate that way. In Canada, we also have the CBC, whose budget is controlled by the government in power. Common sense says that it is in their best interest to report more favourably on the party in power, lest they lose some funding. Then the corporate media repeat what the CBC reported. It is a recipe to benefit the status quo.


But I think the bigger factor is simply that Canadians, particularly in the eastern half of the country, don't see a viable alternative right now. The NDP clearly isn't ready for prime time, and this impression was reinforced by how they sold their souls and propped up the corrupt Liberal government just to pass some budget spending. And we see the Harper Conservative Party as too far to the right. It would be nice if we could go back to the good old days of the 80's and 90's when there wasn't too big a difference between the major parties, and one could be there to keep the other one honest. Back then their policies were almost interchangeable - the Conservatives brought you the GST and the Liberals balanced the budget. Ideally the two parties could slug it out over a few dollars here and a few programs there, and if great moral issues were to come up there could be free votes where each MP could vote according to his/her conscience and constituents.


But the Progressive Conservatives have given way to the Neo-Conservatives, and they just aren't palatable to most Canadians. I don't even think they would be all that palatable to Western Canadians - by and large traditional conservatives - if they really stopped to think about it instead of leaning on the crutch of old animosity toward Pierre Trudeau, some of it rightly and some of it wrongly. I read some of the conservative blogs, and I give them credit for harping on the Liberal scandals because somebody has to be out there speaking truth to power. But it's obvious that some of those people have been overdosing on the Kool-Aid. They blame the East for the political fracture in Canada when, in fact, eastern Canadians have shown a willingness to vote for the Conservatives if that party smartens up. Westerners, on the other hand, are not likely to vote for Liberals under any circumstances for at least another generation or two. It is they who are the inflexible ones.


So I'm in a position in which I don't know who to vote for. It definitely won't be one of the big 2 1/2. I'll probably vote Green. In the end, we'll probably see another minority government after the next election one way or the other. The Liberals definitely need to clean house, and the Conservatives need to promote a platform for all Canadians. Sad to say, Adscam has caused Quebec to be lost to all federalist parties, and that is the costliest aspect to this whole sordid affair.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jay!

Congrats on your blog. I enjoyed your latest entry. However, I do disagree with two main points.

As a longtime member of the "corporate" media, I don't think the media has been "lazy" in "transmitting the party lines" on the Adscam story. Actually, quite the opposite. I think we've done it to death. And that's maybe why Canadians are tuning it out.

Personally, here at CTV Newsnet, I have spent countless hours doing stories on the scandal and the Gomery Inquiry. Most of these stories, if not all, have been very damaging to the Liberals and did not follow "party lines." This even though the Gomery Inquiry isn't a court of law.

Almost daily, I clipped one of the main players in the scandal, using a quote that made the government look bad. Rather than failing to report on the scandal, I think we've done it to death.

I do agree with you when you say the media is merely concerned with the bottom line. But the Sponsorship Story falls easily into that trap. It's the kind of story the coporate media loves. That's because it doesn't take any investigative work... all you need is a sensational clip of two from Gagliano or Breau and you have a lead.

However, it DOES take time and effort to do real news... breaking away from the sensational. For example, the UN recently scolded the Martin Government on child poverty in Canada. We're really falling behind in this area. Many Canadian children live below the poverty line. Hardly anyone in the media followed up this story.

To me, this is far more of an outrage than Adscam.

And that brings me to my second point about your blog. You say the NDP "sold their souls" to prop up a corrupt Liberal government. To me, the term "sold their souls" means someone went AGAINST principle for short term gain. I don't believe the NDP did this. In fact, I believe they did the exact opposite. The New Dems worked the minority government situation AS IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE WORKED, to promote policies that completely represent the party's principles.

The NDP managed to push through a budget that gives students with their first tuition break in more than a decade. It also provides money for foreign aid, the environment and cities whose transit systems are falling apart.

What's wrong with that?

Remember, minority governments are SUPPOSED to be about compromise. That's how we got Medicare and pensions... NDP/CCF partnerships with Liberal governments. The Neo Cons could have done the same. They could have gone to Martin and said "we'll support your budget this time, if you give us this, this, and that."

But Harper and company were more consumed with power than anything else. They smelled blood. Bringing down the government and forcing an election that no one wanted was more important than policy.

On the other hand, the NDP stayed away from mud-slinging and got something done in a minority situation. They showed brains and leadership... true signs of a party that SHOULD be given a chance to govern.

A party with 19 seats was able to do more than the Conservatives with 98!!

7/19/2005 11:08:00 p.m.  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And another thing...

I would also disagree that the CBC reports more favourably on the government in power. I know that the National has been all over the Adscam story.

And when Mulroney was in power, he certainly wasn't a favourite of Mansbridge and company.

I would also challenge the belief that things were better in the 80's, when as you say one party could "keep the other in check."

The Tories had plenty of scandals of their own in those days... Remember Sinclair Stephens?

Stevie Cameron's book "On the Take" brilliantly sums up the Mulroney era.

7/19/2005 11:08:00 p.m.  
Blogger Jaymeister said...

Thanks for your comments, Mike.

It's good to hear a defence from a media insider. I don't mind being set straight from time to time - I'm just stating opinions and impressions here. There is certainly an impression from our small c conservative friends that the CBC has been soft on the government scandals. As for the NDP, again I think I was trying to convey the general public impression of them, and why they don't get more widespread support despite sharing the values of many Canadians - especially in light of scandal with the current government.

Also, to clarify, I didn't mean to imply that there was no scandal in the 80's with Mulroney et al. I just liked the fact that we had two parties at the time who had broad national appeal, and there wasn't too much contemplation of suicide or emigration if one party or the other won an election. Canada now has its own red/blue divide.

7/19/2005 11:09:00 p.m.  

Post a Comment

<< Home